If morality was truly objective, there wouldn’t be thousands of religions and moral systems
Then why do Christians disagree on so many moral issues if their morality is objective?
But if something is truly objective, it shouldn’t rely on perfect human interpretation to stay consistent the fact that it’s so easily misinterpreted by millions shows it’s not as clear or objective as claimed
He means the one about argument and dialogue
Of course it’s subjective just like every human interpretation of morality, including yours. That’s exactly my point
But the interpretation and application of those facts especially in moral or religious contexts are often subjective. That’s the difference
At this point, you’re just repeating definitions while ignoring the actual argument