Lejupielādēt lietotni
Sūti un saņem anonīmus ziņojumus

Lejupielādē lietotni, lai sūtītu un saņemtu anonīmus 💌 ziņojumus

  1. Pieskaries “Kopīgot”
  2. Pieskaries “Pievienot sākuma ekrānam”
Pievienojies bez maksas
lv
Lejupielādēt lietotni
Anonīmas tērzēšanas istabas, iepazīšanās lomu spēle ar nejaušiem svešiniekiem tiešsaistē
Atveriet kameras lietotni savā tālrunī un noskenējiet iepriekš redzamo QR kodu
Select your language
✖️
Sākums/Pavedieni/

Who do you think is giving them money

Who do you think is giving them money
the people who are trying to sell entertainment.
Advertisers and marketers. So you agree with me but you’re a contrarian imbecile
Are you arguing that celebs are fabricated personas as part of an ad campaign not actors?
Uhhhhh yes? You think what you see is the real person
I'm saying that if the advertisers were smart they would quit trying to sell fabricated personas, it hurts their brand.
Yeah, they should start selling to your sensibilities specifically instead of making record profits every year
"Record profits this year". Hehe, look bro I hope nobody is counting on that
Look at a chart dude advertising takes up a massive chunk of the pie and it’s only getting bigger
I'm not gonna post more paragraphs, but imagine paying more for decreasing attention.
It’s not about attention it’s about exposure and saturation, again, do some research on market psychology
The market is not infinitely large, so at a certain point returns diminish,
And? They cut corners
If you are less than 35 years old you have never, experienced a economic cycle where the advertisers get burned.
I’ve seen advertising campaigns fail. I’ve never seen the advertising industry even hiccup
We had 0% interest rates for a decade, that amount of free money ONLY helps advertisers. At 0% interest you can pay a million dollars for 1 view and it pays for itself.
I think we are once again agreeing