์•ฑ ๋ฐ›๊ธฐ
Send and receive anonymous messages

Get App to send and receive anonymous ๐Ÿ’Œ messages

  1. Tap โ€œShareโ€
  2. Tap โ€œAdd to Home Screenโ€
Join Free
ko
โœ–
์•ฑ ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ
์ต๋ช… ์ฑ„ํŒ…๋ฐฉ, ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ๋‚ฏ์„  ์‚ฌ๋žŒ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํŠธ ์—ญํ• ๋†€์ด ๊ฒŒ์ž„
ํœด๋Œ€ํฐ์—์„œ ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ ์•ฑ์„ ์—ด๊ณ  ์œ„์˜ QR ์ฝ”๋“œ๋ฅผ ์Šค์บ”ํ•˜์„ธ์š”
โœ–
Select your language
โœ–๏ธ
ํ™ˆ/Threads/

Cause I never generalized.. that was you

Cause I never generalized.. that was you
On a side note Generalization isnโ€™t bad. Entire field of AI relies on generalisation
And AI has an average IQ
For now. Iโ€™m saying taking a small training set and extrapolating isnโ€™t a bad idea. Statistics uses this trick too.
And itโ€™s almost never accurate to represent the entire population , which statisticians put effort in clarifying
Statement about โ€œallโ€ is wrong. Say if you measure average height from a small sample. It will be close to the total populations average height with high probability.
Not quite ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ
It is quite accurate. The AI relies on minimizing Genaralization error. Itโ€™s not bad as it stands now.
You donโ€™t need AI to get an average
Sirโ€ฆ. Iโ€™m a social scientist by degree