I work in AI and I tell you we generalize. Sure there can be sophisticated generalisations.
Now I see where your bias lies.
There is nothing of that sort. See any scientific trials. They do take random samples and conclude results. We believe those results right?
Would depend on the study and the results
Well studies would take in a random population to get a good mix. The larger the sample the better.
Depends on WHAT is being asked bro
You’re never going to get accurate data when dealing with population
No one strives for 100 percent accuracy.
That’s not the point lol
The only way to get an accurate statistic for an entire population is to survery the entire population
Exactly. Idk why he’s still arguing thinking any studies trying to find info for an entire population is accurate…. It doesn’t work that way
Then how do you think studies are done. Do they collect urine sample from every house?
Studies can be done on SPECIFIC topics
Correct. So my topic is urine microbial property. So I don’t go to every house to collect urine. I collect from a randomly chosen 10000 population and generalize. See Chernoff bound
Generalizing is stupid
Obviously not sophisticated if AI IQ is average
Please AI is getting sophisticated by the day.
Cap…. But I understand your hopeful manifestation since you work for AI
See you can’t call cap on AI if you don’t understand the principles behind it.
Wir verwenden Cookies, um dir ein reibungsloses Surferlebnis zu bieten. Wir zeigen keine Werbung und halten deine Erfahrung pseudonym.
